All sound too cheezy, bait & switch. None are appealing & I'd ignore the entire ad.

None are appealing to me. And I'm not competing with the flat fee and less than 2% commission agents... in fact, I'm often the second agent in on the listings they fail to sell because you get what you pay for.

The flat fee would appeal to a home owner. Save $9000 may appeal to an agent.

You get what you pay for.

People do not go FSBO to avoid a Commission !!!

Instead the are like everyone else and often are looking for a deal or a way to SAVE MONEY .

as an agent, I don't like any of them....

the sellers don't always want a discounted commission.... it depends on your presentation and what you have to offer.... they want a sale and they want to pay an agent who provides alot for them...

I like the first one best.

As a homeowner, I think #2 would appeal the most. I know what it will cost, regardless of the price obtained, and I can make my decision accordingly. 

Not for me.

I have been a seller for a very long time and would not hire an agent who used any of these. 

I always sought out agents who did not feel the need to offer disounts, I wanted the best to market my properties and get the Best price and deal for me.

Only a fool hires a poor agent to represent them.

Most appealing to the home owner?!

"I will sell your home for more, and net you more money!"

ba-bam!

Bait and switch.  A seller took a bait program and found out they were not eligible for instant buy back.

In my experience the flat fee brokers don't do too well... and they usually charge less than you are talking about.

Less 2% commissission is popular, we have people here who are known as 4%ers or "discount brokers" and then you have the redfins of the world who give everyone a rebate.

The only time I see "save 9,000" is when title companies and escrow companies are trying to get investor clients and offering discounted rates.

    None of them appeal to me, until I know who is offering this "deal", what is the catch, are they capable of selling my house.

Annette Lawrence , Palm Harbor, FL 727-420-4041 From an agent perspective I don't like any of them. From a home owner perspecive, they would probably choose number two and negotiate down from there.

None of these. 

As the Three Musketeer's say: "All for one and one for all"

In real estate, none appeal as they all indicate sub par services to me.

In the context of the choices, Wayne Martin has your answer.

Circumstances may dictate the choice!

1. Is a car commercial,so it has nothing to do with real estate. #2  A flat fee for what? If it is commission, then the homeowner would like it. # 3 is lower RE commission, so the homeowner would like it. There is nothing the agent would like, unless they are buying a new car

Not one answer to this. Whatever is best and whatever is neogtiated.

If I am the typical consumer and don't know much about real estate marketing or costs I think any of these might appeal to me. If these were offered by three different agents I might be inclined to call all 3 and find out more specifics but if they wouldn't give me details on the phone I would be likely to assume its a misleading ad and go no further with them.

To your question: Consumers are not that stupid...or are they?

Annette Lawrence , Palm Harbor, FL 727-420-4041 - let me skip this! I liked none!

None of the above

If you are messing with my commissions, none are appealing. The public will like all you will give them.

Annette Lawrence , Palm Harbor, FL 727-420-4041 #2, & #3 will appeal to the most home owners.

Not a fan of #3 because it discounts the buyer's agents commission & you don't want to get passed over by buyer's agents. The flat fee would be nice if I was selling an expensive property where the 5% commission would be much more- I'd like that as the Seller. I can't speak on #1 because I haven't heard about it. As an Agent it's 5-6% period. 

Of the 3 options I would rank them high to low:

1

2

3

I do not like any of them. Discount fees mean discount service. I prefer to use positive messages to attract sellers. 

That place where we all agree is best left to that moment & cicumstances

None are appealing to me as a real estate agent - none are what I offer. It simply does not align with my service model.  

As for homeowners - what is more appealing to them - it depends on the homeowner and their level of wealth, or lack of it. 

None are appealing

I am not a discount agent.  You get what you pay for.  When sellers or buyers ask for a discount, I hand them a document with 200 plus steps in a real estate transaction and ask them to cross out what they don't want me to do.  

Of course, I've made concessions to make a deal work but only on rare occassions.  And it goes on the closing docs with lender approval if its a buyer, including the purcahse of a home warranty.  

None of these.