Joan - I think it's especially important on high-end homes to include at least one aerial.  Even on mid-priced properties it should be done if it highlights something important such as location or view.

John McCormack - That's interesting.  Why do you think it's not done much in your market?  I would think it would set agents apart from the average, especially if the property warrants it such as a farm/ranch, waterfront, etc.

Praful Thakkar - I didn't necessarily mean with the use of drones as aerial photographers can be found in many parts throughout the country.  Perhaps their prices will become more reasonable if/when drones are legally allowed for commercial use.  In cases where it's a higher-end property, especially on a large lot or if it's waterfront or golf-course front, I would think aerial photos should give a listing agent an edge.  I've even seen a few agents use a device that allows photos to be taken from around a 20+/- foot perspective... sort of like a really long selfie-stick.

Jaretta - I think with as many photos as many 20-somethings take, they are used to seeing things from all (or different) angles and perhaps have more of an interest in aerial photos.

Barbara - I agree with you that they are (or should be) a must for properties that include a lot of land and also that the aerial photos sometimes make more sense to be included near the front of the photo gallery instead of last.

Jeff - I'm actually a bit surprised to hear that  very few sellers are interested in aerial photos, especially if their property is on a large lot, waterfront or backs up to a golf course.

Nina - I guess my thinking is that although it's not really "necessary", it likely gives listing agents who include aerial photos (especially on higher end listings or ones that are waterfront) an edge.

Russ - with as many lakefront properties as are in your area, I'm surprised it doesn't bring results due to the "wow" factor.

Larry - I think it's only a matter of time before more & more people use drones.  I'm just not sure it won't cause some problems as the laws just don't seem to keep up with emerging technologies.

Lise - it makes perfect sense to include an aerial photo on properties that are 2 acres, and especially if they include amenities such as the listing you're getting which has a pool and tennis court.  I think many properties that are waterfront (lake, river, intracoastal, ocean) could benefit from an aerial photo even if it's not on a large lot.

Bob Publicover - I think in Florida (especially with coastal properties) it makes sense.  I'm curious... do you operate the drone yourself or hire someone who does that for a living?